A tribute to Nancy Schaefer

The Nordic Committee for Human Rights

NCHR

For the protection of Family Rights in the Nordic countries

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A tribute to Nancy Schaefer

 

Nancy Schaefer, 1937 - 2010

 

 

 

On behalf of the Board and members of the NCHR, I would like to express our deepest sympathy to the children and grandchildren of Nancy Schaefer & Bruce Schaefer for the untimely loss of your beloved parents and grandparents.

These condolences on the loss of Nancy Schaefer are equally addressed to the Eagle Forum and the other organizations that she founded and presided, to the people of the State of Georgia and to the United States of America. You have lost an activist who was a staunch believer in the American Constitution, the Rule of Law and the protection of the basic Human Rights of children and their families.

Nancy Schaefer's investigation of the "Child Protective Services" led her to write a scathing report on
"The corrupt business of Child Protective Services" in November 2007. Her talk, Nancy Schaefer on CPS, at The Eagle Forum Congress in September 2008, has made her immortal.

Nancy Schaefer's death is not only a great loss for her family, her loved ones, the State of Georgia and the United States, but also for us here in the Nordic countries, where children and their families are suffering under the tyrannical rulings of the social services and the administrative court systems. Nancy Schaefer has been a personal friend of mine and of the NCHR since 2008. We often spoke on the phone or sent e-mails of encouragement to each other. Nancy Schaefer and I met for the first time in August 2009 at the
World Congress of Families V at Amsterdam in The Netherlands, and we were inseparable during the four days we were there. Nancy Schaefer delivered a speech on "The Child Protective Services"  during the "Law-makers session", that shocked the parliamentarians and the ministers of the different governments that participated in WCF V.

Nancy Schaefer gathered information about the children, their parents and families who are being traumatized and destroyed and she published and shared the information. During the years we have known each other Nancy Schaefer has sent innumerable articles and other information to the NCHR about the US state agencies forcibly removing children from their parents' loving care and placing them in often unsuitable foster homes among total strangers, who take the children for money.  

The NCHR recognizes these problems because the situation is the same for thousands of children and families here in the Nordic countries.

Nancy Schaefer was one of the speakers at the NCHR's Symposium on August 22, 2009. We were unable to raise enough money to transport her across the Atlantic, and besides she had been in Amsterdam two weeks earlier, so the NCHR's technician and her son, Edward Schaefer, joined forces and she delivered her speech and answered questions in Gothenburg, from her office in Georgia. It was a most uplifting experience that those of us who attended the NCHR's Symposium on August 22, 2009 will remember for a long time and Nancy Schaefer was pleased to receive the NCHR's Diploma of Appreciation.

My most recent contact with Nancy Schaefer was her e-mail on March 16, 2010, in which she informed me:
"Ruby, I have resigned my position as President of Eagle Forum of Georgia. I will continue to be the National Chairman for Parents' Rights. We are filming parents, grandparents, single moms and single dads who are all victims of the system for a documentary this weekend. I will keep you posted. Stay strong. We must not give up. I believe with all my heart Creator God wants this exposed and brought down. May He bless you and your work! Pressing on, NS".

On Saturday night, March 27, 2010, I received an e-mail announcing "Nancy Schaefer's murder". Information on the Internet claimed that she had been murdered by her husband and that he had committed suicide in keeping with a death-pact, and that the investigations were concentrated on that scenario. I reacted to the biased investigations, because I knew immediately that Nancy & Bruce Schaefer would never hurt their five children and 13 grand children in such a way.

Dear Nancy, your voice for the children of Georgia, the USA and the Nordic countries is now silent, but your example of standing up for the protection of children's basic Human Rights to their parents and families and freedom from confiscation by state agencies will remain in our individual and collective memory.

Rest in peace Nancy & Bruce. You are sadly missed. Those who murdered you both will eventually be brought to justice.

April 1, 2010

 

 

Ruby Harrold-Claesson
Attorney-at-law
President of the NCHR

 

  

 

 

NKMR Symposium at Scandic Crown 22 August
By Gillian Thylander, September 2009


Twist in Schaefer Murder-Suicide - WSB News on wsbradio.com

 

 

 

The Strange “Suicide” of Nancy Schaefer

 

 

 

Former SenatorNancy Schaefer murder-suicide or third partymurder

 

 

 

Back to Articles

 

 

 

 

 

A tribute to Pamela Gaston

The Nordic Committee for Human Rights

NCHR

For the protection of Family Rights in the Nordic countries

 

 

 

 

 

A tribute to Pamela Gaston

 

 

On behalf of the Board and members of the NCHR, I would like to express our deepest sympathy to Will Gaston and family for the untimely loss of your beloved wife and mother, Pamela Gaston.

 

These condolences on the loss of Pamela Gaston are equally addressed to the people of Oregon. You have lost an activist who was a staunch believer in the American Constitution, the Rule of Law and the protection of the basic Human Rights of children and their families. Her experiences in her family's struggle to rescue their daughter, Melissa, from the state agencies, and her involvement in other state care cases, made her aware of the corruption in the legal profession and the court system. She thereafter educated families to act "sui juris" when appearing before the courts.

 

Pamela Gaston's death is not only a great loss for her family, her loved ones, the State of Oregon and the United States, but also for us here in the Nordic countries, where children and their families are suffering under the tyrannical rulings of the social services and the administrative court systems.

 

Pamela Gaston gathered information about the children, their parents and families who are being traumatized and destroyed and she published and shared the information. During the years Pamela Gaston has sent innumerable articles and other information to the NCHR about the US state agencies forcibly removing children from their parents' loving care and placing them in often unsuitable foster homes among total strangers, who take the children for money.

 

The NCHR recognizes these problems because the situation is the same for thousands of children and families here in the Nordic countries.

 

Pamela, your voice for children is now silent but your example of standing up for the protection of children's basic Human Rights to their parents and families and freedom from confiscation by state agencies will remain in our memory.

 

Sadly missed

 

April 8, 2005

 

Ruby Harrold-Claesson

 

Ruby Harrold-Claesson

Attorney-at-law

President of the NCHR

www.nkmr.org  

 

 

 

 A Voice For Children

 

The Gaston Case
Collection of articles from The Statesman Journal, The Oregon Observer and A
Voice for Children


STOP STATE SEIZURE OF NEWBORNS  -  PRESERVE HUMAN FAMILY BODY  RIGHTS
By Pamela Gaston

 

The Christine Case
Collection of articles from Associated Press and Fight CPS and Win



Roger Weidner home page

 

 

 

Back to Articles

 

 

 

Till minne
Astrid Lindgren

 

Astrid Lindgren"Prusseluskans" fiende nummer ett och försvarare av flickors och barns rätt - som var tvungen att fly sitt hemland då hon var som mest ung och sårbar och väntade ett s k "oäkta" barn, och till Eva Andén, Sveriges första kvinnliga advokat, som hjälpte Astrid Lindgren och andra unga kvinnor att finna en skyddad plats för dem och deras barn.

 

Samma jakt pågår än i dag (jmf t ex artikeln Antikrists änglar)

 

Peter Klevius (ett oäkta barn till en jagad mor) för NKMR

 

 

A Tribute to T

A Tribute to T

 

By Anu Suomela

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Anu Suomela is the president of PESUE - the Association for Family Rights in Finland. She was the legal representative for R in the case of R. v. Finland and also for Katrin and Timo (K & T) in their case K. & T. v. Finland in the European Court of Human Rights.

 

The following is Anu Suomela's tribute to her good friend and supporter in Human Rights, Finnish lawyer T., who perished in the Tsunami on December 26, 2004.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

T's family tragedy
 

T. travelled for her long wanted holidays to Chao Laki with her husband and three children (13, 19 and 22 years old) on 17.12.2004, and informed me by letter to come home on 27.1.2005. She worked as a public legal aid council. Together we had been fighters for human rights in Finland for over 10 years.

 

 

 

But the tsunami came on 26.12.2004. The wave threw K. the oldest daughter (22 years) to the top of a palm tree. She hung there for six hours badly wounded, but survived and was brought home. We had a memorial service on 26.3.2005, but at that time only the father was found. In May I heard that also T. and the other daughter were found. I thought they had been buried in silence. The son was found only in November and brought home.

 

 

 

T. lived in Pohjanmaa, Lappajärvi and I've visited her several times. We celebrated my victory in the case of K & T there in summer 2000, and I have the ten red dried roses from her on my bookshelf.

 

 

 

Anyhow. Her loss was a total chock for me, and there has not since been a day I wouldn't have thought her, and in legal cases asked in my mind

 

'What do you say T.?'.

 

 

 

 

 

The funeral

 

 

 

A good friend of mine had in spring invited us to Pohjanmaa to hear a famous opera on 18.6.2005. My husband and I drove there and stayed over night. On Sunday I wanted to drive to Lappajärvi to leave flowers on T's grave. We arrived there at 2 pm. At the same time the church bells started to ring and the church doors opened. T. and the other daughter were being brought out to their grave.

 

 

 

I stood there stricken by a thunder light. How come I am here now at the exact hour, though I had no knowledge of the funeral? (I do not believe in mysticism explanations, this was just a coincidence, but the situation was so striking to me). Later I heard the whole story from T's and my common friend P.

 

 

 

On November 2004 T. and P. had had a long conversation about friendship. P. had introduced T. the idea of each of us having six friends 'to carry your coffin'. Who would they be for T.? She had named me for the first, P. for the second and one of her sisters for the third. She had said that she has to think over the remaining three.

 

 

 

After coming home from Chao Laki, the daughter K. had told  P., that the day before the tsunami, she had been bathing on the beach with her mother. The mother had then told to K. the idea of six friends for carrying your coffin. K. had now asked P. whether T. had named any for herself, as she had not told this to K.

 

 

 

P. had revealed that I was the first, the second was P. and the third was the sister. K. had then wanted to follow her mother’s wish, but the family objected to inviting me at all, as I have such a bad reputation at Pohjanmaa. I have a reputation on resisting the authority and 'good order' and defending paedophiles. It is true that I've been several times as an expert witness in sexual abuse accusations, but never defended paedophilia.

 

 

 

K. was too weak and tired to resist and did not even know what was so bad in my person. It had been a fight even to allow P. to be one of the carriers. It was a question of the family's honour and good name. I heard that it had been all wrong to invite me even to the memorial service in March.

 

 

 

P. told me that when she knew all this and coming out of the church saw me standing there and waiting, she almost collapsed. She knew that I could not have known of the funeral, and yet there I was, the first carrier as T. had wished for. All this information was for me so astonishing, I did not know what hatred I had caused inside the family by defending people accused of sexual abuse. T. newer thought that way, as she was an analytical lawyer and her principal was to find out the material, historical truth of the case.

 

 

 

 

 

T's fight for human rights

 

 

And now T. gets her post Hume winning at the ECHR. She was a fire hearted, fearless fighter for Human Rights. When I was sometimes tired and depressed in the case of K & T, as the Government did everything possible to smear and discredit me T. stated: 'Now you do not care what Piia-Liisa Heiliö (the ministry of social and welfare) writes and does to put you down. You do not give up now! Lets weep and heal the wounds when this battle is over'. And so we did.

 

 

 

In this case of R. T. did all she could, but the more she tried the worse her client's situation got, as the social workers felt themselves threatened.

 

 

 

What is so disgusting in the Government's explanation to the Court, is that the violation of the of access rights was well taken care on the national level. The truth is that after fighting for three years to get an appeal able decision T. contacted her friend Anneli Jäätteenmäki who then acted as the minister of justice.

 

 

 

Anneli had contacted the Parliamentary Ombudsman whose office then had contacted the local social workers. Only after this procedure the client got an appeal able decision, but even then the social workers took their revenge and lessened the contact with the father and son to half. And the Government praises itself of how splendidly the system works on the national level correcting the faults of social workers.

 

 

 

After this long lasting alienation and manipulation, the boy did not want to meet his parents anymore. The substitute parents had told him that if he wanted to live with his father he would end up living in the children's home, which he hated.

 

 

 

If you read the judgment you find at the last paragraph that the father refused to take any compensation from the Government for his sufferings, as it only would have reminded him of the wrongs he had suffered of.

 

 

 

T. told me that the father said, that his whole life has been destroyed. He has been accused of the most disgusting criminal acts against his little boy whom he dearly loved and tried to protect. He was a religious man and lost his faith in God too, and thereafter the society where his friends were. He has not answered to my letters though I was the first he contacted in 1993 to get help.

 

 

 

 

 

In honour of T.

 

 

 

When this judgement of R. was declared on Tuesday 30.05.2006, I sent it to Jussi Kortteinen with whom I've twice been in Strasbourg in oral hearings. He well knows the history of T. He had just on Monday started a seminar on administrative legislation at the University of Helsinki. He immediately emailed me back that he will start his lecture with this case to honour T's work, and it will remain as a judgement for her honour in the history of ECHR.

 

 

 

It will. And I'm so humble and thankful to people fighting for Human Rights with me and us all. I want to leave a better world for my seven grand children to live in. There are so many dangers against democracy and Human Rights. Democracy is a one millimetre thin layer in human history,

 

started actively only after the Second World War by Declarations of Human Rights, when we saw what totalitarian ideas made people to do destroying millions of lives.

 

 

 

The war and destruction goes on around the world as democracy has not been adopted, and has been abandoned in US politics. We cannot give up.

 

As frustrating as these situations often are, we sometimes win and thereby help to guarantee our fellow men better Human Rights. Often we loose and therefore we have to go on and never give up.

 

 

 

 

 

R. v. Finland

 

 

 

Back to European Court

 

 

 

Back to Main



Tillbaka till Europadomstolen

 

 

 

Tillbaka till Huvudsidan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Till minne av Bernt Hörnell

Av Sven-Erik Berg, Morfar, Nordmaling

 

 

 

 
Sven-Erik Berg har i flera år kritiserat det svenska systemet för tvångsomhändertagande av barn (LVU) och den förföljelse som barnets föräldrar och släkt utsätts för av enskilda sociala tjänstemän - med politikernas och andra myndigheters stöd och välvilja. Docent Bo Edvardsson kallar det för "förföljande strategier".

Sven-Erik Berg är inte bara en "tyckare". Han har egna erfarenheter av den enorma psykiska pressen som den enskilda utsätts för i samband med att barn tvångsomhändertas och fosterhemsplaceras av socialtjänsten. Hans barnbarn blev tvångsomhändertaget och placerat i fosterhem.
Läs Tinafallet där Sven-Erik Berg berättar om familjens kamp för barnets rätt till sin egen familj och släkt. Kampen var lång och grym. Sven-Erik Berg och hans fru, Ingrid, demonstrerade utanför socialkontoret. Socialarbetarna polisanmälde dem för förtal. Familjen Berg polisanmälde socialarbetarna för tjänstefel. Polis och åklagare utredde aldrig socialtjänstens brott. Sven-Erik Berg dömdes att betala skadestånd till socialarbetarna som hade konfiskerat hans barnbarn och lämnat henne som försörjningsobjekt åt skrupelfria fosterföräldrar.
Men han kämpade vidare - och vann. Barnet återlämnades till sin släkt.

Familjen Berg var dock starka. De har pliktat med sin hälsa men inte med sina liv -hjärtinfarkt, stroke eller självmord - som så många andra som har kämpat för att skydda sina familjer mot socialtjänsten har fått göra.

Runan till minne av Bernt Hörnell publiceras här med författarens benägna tillstånd.  

 

Tidigt på morgonen 21 juni avled Bernt Hörnell vid 61 års ålder. Hjärtat orkade inte längre. De sociala myndigheterna har nu ytterligare ett liv på sitt samvete.

 

De senaste cirka två åren har familjen varit utsatt för något som utan vidare kan klassas som en ren häxjakt från de sociala myndigheternas sida. En i alla avseenden skötsam familj råkade i klorna på tjänstemän som av allt att döma aldrig läst, alternativt läst men inte förstått texten i Socialtjänstlagen. Undanhållande av handlingar/fakta, påhittade "bevis" samt en stor portion subjektivt tyckande, gjorde det möjligt att hålla familjens minderåriga flicka separerad från mamman och pappan under åtskilliga månaders tid.

 

Behandlingen till trots visade familjen med Bernt i spetsen berömvärt tålamod och lugn – utåt. Vi som kände familjen, kunde notera hur illa familjemedlemmarna for och befarade att det hela skulle sluta på sätt som nu skett.

 

Det är lätt att se sambandet mellan myndigheternas brutala behandling av familjen och Bernts tragiska bortgång. Samtidigt tvingas vi konstatera att tjänstemän och politiker som styrt händelseutvecklingen även fortsättningsvis avlönas/arvoderas av skattebetalarna i Örnsköldsviks kommun.

 

En inte allt för vågad gissning är, att de påstår sig agera "för barnets bästa".

 

 

Socialas agerande skördar liv!

Av Sven-Erik Berg

 

Örnsköldsviksfallet. Anonymt brev slog familjens liv i spillror
En serie artiklar i Örnsköldsviks Allehanda

 

Stora brister i utredningar om barn som far illa
Av Ruby Harrold-Claesson

 

Realtime website traffic tracker, online visitor stats and hit counter