Parental alienation – What is it? What to do about it?
International conference, August 24-25, 2018, in Stockholm
Moderna Museet, the auditorium
pdfInternational Conference on Parental Alienation

European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights / EU:s byrå för grundläggande rättigheter

NKMR har blivit godkänd att medverka i Fundamental Rights Platform FRP vid EU:s byrå för grundläggande rättigheter


pdfVälkomstbrevet

pdfUppförandekodex

VICTIMS MISSION Organises International Conference 28 May in Vienna

Vienna, Austria (pts012/23.05.2016/10:30) - The charity organisation VICTIMS MISSION invites you to the international conference "Child Abduction as Weapon of Family Destruction" to the Grand Hotel Vienna on 28 May 2016. Beate Kelly, Mag. Josef Maitz, Gerda Ressl, Cara St. Louis and Dr. Henning Witte will speak on the topic. Afterwards there will be a panel discussion. Sissi Kammerlander will give the introduction and act as moderator.

Read more: Child Abduction as Weapon of Family Destruction

 

Europaparlamentet


Petition nr 2434/2014 - Admissiblity Decision / Beslut om sakprövning

Ordföranden i Europaparlamentets Petitionskommittén,( PETI), Cecilia Wikström,
har i brev den 13 januari 2016, meddelat att Petitionen som 40 framstående nordiska jurister och andra professionella underställde för kommitténs granskning, har förklarats admissible, dvs beviljats prövningstillstånd.

pdfEuropaparlamentet - Petition No. 2434-2014 - Letter 2016-01-13

pdfEuropaparlamentet - Petition No. 2434-2014 - Brev 2016-01-13 

Sammanfattning och åtgärd

Petitionen 

European Parliament Petitions Committee
SUMMARIES, INFORMATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Petitions Nos 2426 and 2434/2014

Admissibility and action

The Chair's recommendations on admissibility and action will be deemed adopted unless any comments are received by 14 July 2015.

 

Read more: European Parliament - Summaries, Information and Recommendations

 

 

LETTERS TO THE NCHR

 

 

This page features letters - cries for help or other - that have been sent to the NCHR by overseas visitors to our site. The letters are published with the special consent of the individuals involved.

 


The Lynnae Lake  Case
Presented by Will Gaston


Stolen Child
Nathan E Wilson's e-mail letters to the NCHR, December 29, 2002, July 31, 2003 and November 6, 2003


Hyacinth Österlin’s letter to the NCHR. An emigrated immigrant's views on the Götene Case
E-mail letter to the NCHR - November 21, 2002.


Amon Muwanga’s
E-mail message to the NCHR - March 30, 2002


Pres. Bush, Are You on Our Side?
Lorri Ellen Carr’s e-mail letter to the NCHR - September 15, 2001


Suppression of Family Rights
Julian Fitzgerald’s e-mail letter to the NCHR


Illegal Adoptions in Australia
Margaret McGrath's e-mail letter to the NCHR - July 11, 2001


The Kadidja Kalekola Case
Amon Muwanga's e-mail letters to the NCHR - June 11 & 18, 2001


The Kadidja Kalekola Case
Zacharia Mori's e-mail letter to the NCHR - June 11, 2001


 Help!!!
Deborah's cry for help - e-mail letter to the NCHR - May 31, 2001


Must fight for our children !
Gloria Kikuts' e-mail letters to the NCHR - March 16 & 21, 2001


My Parental Rights
Michelle Cave's e-mail letter to the NCHR - October 4, 2000


 Letter from The Legal Defense Foundation for Children
Denise Marhoefer's e-mail letter to the NCHR - February 13, 2001


Mother seeking regugee status in Canada
Diane Booth's e-mail letter to the NCHR - November 4, 2000
 

 Can you help me? I read your website
Donna Fischer's e-mail letter to the NCHR - November 8, 2000

 

 

Back to Main Index

 

To Article Index

 

Letter from The Legal Defense Foundation for Children

 To: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

 

 

This e-mail was sent to the Board of the NCHR by Denise Marhoefer of The Legal Defense Foundation for Children on February 13, 2001. It is published here with the special consent of the writer, Denise Marhoefer.

 

 

Dear Ruby Harrold-Claesson, and associates;

I just wanted to write and tell you that I do share your same concerns with
the same problems....I am contacted by so many mothers who have lost their
children.
Often it is larger numbers 4, 5, or 6,.........they seem to be not charged with
anything....they are removed for things such as a messy house, home school,
or as was mentioned, a parent not wanting to put their child on Ritalin.......
Without being charged they sometimes are offered one child back in exchange
for signing over the rights to the others...........
Whether it is oppression of the poor....
this is not something I know how to make sense of yet.......
I do know because I have four children, you do not have money and children,
at the same time....you make ends meet........
I also know that there is a definite correlation between having children,
especially larger numbers of them, and a mess......
matter of fact, it is conclusive.......
but certainly no reason for children to be taken from a loving mother....
the standards and expectations are attainable by no one.......
and especially not a mother who needs to be spending time playing and loving
their young ones.......
What I think is ironic, is how it is so acceptable for a male to have their
house a wreck, and this is socially acceptable,
but enter one female.....and all the sudden it is totally different. Why?
I am not against males or men, just absurdity....
Any society who thinks there will be no reprecussions for these actions
are going to be sadly mistaken......
the loss of a parent for something so trivial,
will effect these children........and no one is considering this.
It is not abusive to not have the best and the finest.......

What I have to wonder is where are the women's rights activists for
this...... or are they only active for those who are pro choice.....
I work for both male and female children.....I work with male as well as
female.
I have been turned down for funding because I do not solely benefit
women and girls.

At first, I thought, ok, it is just a problem that is happening to a family down the street.
Then I find several in the state, then I find hundreds and hundreds nation wide
........and now all that is happening everywhere............

where do you start?

How do you start?

I thank you for listening, for actually my pain is just from one mother on behalf of another...........

Sincerely,

Denise Marhoefer

Denise Marhoefer
The Legal Defense Foundation for children

PO Box 65
Losantville, IN 47354
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.">This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.


"To escape criticism, do nothing, say nothing, be nothing."
--Elbert Hubbard 1856-1915

 

Can you help me? I read your website

When the state becomes parent

Back to Letters to The NCHR

Back to Main

 

Can you help me? I read your website

To: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

 

 

This e-mail was sent to the board of the NCHR on November 8, 2000, at 05.24. It is published here with the special consent of the writer, Donna Fischer.

 

 

I have lost my 2 boys and one is home. I went to trial to fight for my
youngest son, who eventually is now with the foster mom, she got physical
custody, but I did not get terminated. Yet, I might have pay child
support for my child I will not be able to even see. This is tragedy! They
have destroyed my little boy. This had gone on for 3 years. My youngest was
3 and he was put in a foster home that had only mentally retarded older
foster children. I still suspect sexual abuse from things I noticed from my
son on supervised visits. I did everything, everything, I went bankrupt, I
had one heart attack. They don't care, the abuse my children had and still
are taking, and the abuse I took and the grandparents. I am going to appeal,
my attorney put me in a position where I have no choice, or money. Is there
any law I can use for a judge allowing my child to be put in this foster
home, after it came out finally in the trial that the social workers had no
intentions of giving my children back? I had 4 Social Workers, and one told
me to my face I would never get my kids back, that was in my 3rd month and I
just started a case plan. The other social worker told a therapist who was
working with me and my oldest son. I was also put in chemical abuse
treatment for 29 days for a medication my doctor ordered me to take. That
also came out in the trial. There is fraud by the Social Workers, deception
and slander. How could a judge play into their favor? Any help would be
appreciated. I have until Tuesday to get my appeal out.


Thank you,


Donna Fisher
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

American Mother seeking refugee status in Canada

Back to Letters to the NCHR

 

 

 

Realtime website traffic tracker, online visitor stats and hit counter