Sinister agenda behind smacking ban

By Patrick McGinnity, County Armagh in Northern Ireland

 

 

 

 

Patrick McGinnity often writes comments on articles concerning contemporary societal issues in Northern Ireland. He also writes letters to the Editors of several Irish newspapers. 

This piece was published on July 24, 2007 as a letter to the Editor at The Irish Daily Mail under the title "Parents' right to smack".

consent of the author.

 

 

 


 

 

 

Dear Sir / Madam,

Norah O'Grady (Mail, July 16th) wisely recognises that "An outright ban on smacking children - as called for by Children's Ombudsman Emily O'Reilly - would be utterly counterproductive". She warns that we could expect to see "a lot of good parents dragged before the courts".

Jim O'Leary (July 17th) takes the opposite view, citing the example of Sweden where they have had an outright ban on corporal punishment since the Seventies. He says "compared with Ireland, Sweden is paradise on earth".

Mr O'Leary is very much mistaken. Ever since
the emergence of The Nordic Committee for Human Rights (NCHR) in 1996, a very disturbing story has begun to come out of Sweden. Consisting of lawyers, doctors, teachers and academics, The NCHR has shown how the last Swedish government waged war on the private family in favour of the state-controlled family.

This government, which was replaced in October 2006, succeeded in divesting many Swedish parents of their power and transferring it to the state, under the guise of acting in the child's
"best interests".

The NCHR claims thousands of Swedish children have been taken away from their parents and placed in foster homes, despite Sweden having no real poverty and very few real social problems. More information can be found on the NCHR website.

The anti-smacking law was only one of a number of weapons the previous Swedish government used to criminalize parents. The NCHR claims that since the anti- smacking bill became law in Sweden, thousands of parents have been reported, accused, arrested by police, detained, tried in courts and sentenced to fines or imprisonment.

REFERENCES:
At this weblink http://www.nzcpd.com there is an opinion piece by Ruby Harrold-Claesson, Gothenburg, Sweden. Ms Harrold-Claesson is an attorney-at-law and President of the Nordic Committee for Human Rights. The Opinion piece is entitled "
The Smacking Ban: A dangerous law" and was written on 24th March 07.

This is the website of the NCHR:
http://www.nkmr.org/english/index.htm

At this weblink http://www.nzcpd.com there is an article by former New Zealand MP Muriel Newman entitled "The Smacking Bill a Con Job".

 

 

Sinister agenda behind children’s rights proposal
By Patrick McGinnity


The Smacking Bill a Con Job
By Muriel Newman

 

The Smacking Ban: A dangerous law
By Ruby Harrold-Claesson

 

The Folly of Sweden's state controlled families
By Siv Westerberg

 

 

Back to Articles