Social workers who stay more than a year in "child protection" are the scum of the earth!
By Ian Josephs, MA, LLB, author

Ian Josephs, MA, LLB, author of the book "Forced Adoption" and owner and manager of the web site "Forced Adoption", lives and works in Monaco where he owns and runs a language school. He has an Oxford University law degree but he is not a solicitor or a barrister.

Fighting the often brutal actions of Social Services is a cause very close to his heart. Social Services have never hurt him, his family or anyone close to him so he has no personal axe to grind but "I HATE THE ABUSE OF POWER", he states, and particularly the way the bullies in social services ruthlessly destroy the very families they are supposed to protect.

Ian Josephs was one of the lecturers at the NCHR's Symposium in Gothenburg, August 22, 2009.

This article is previously published as a comment to The Times article published on March 4, 2010: Spanish authorities seize British boy from parents.

Ian Josephs' comment is reproduced here with his special consent.

Alas, I regret to say that social workers who stay more than a year in "child protection" are the scum of the earth!

They regularly take babies "at risk of emotional abuse" for adoption by strangers. Punishing parents not for anything they have done but for what some hired charlatan (using a crystal ball?) thinks they might do!

On the other hand babies and young children (Baby P, Victoria Climbé etc) who have been savagely injured physically are poor adoption material so they are callously left to die. The "SS" hirelings then dare to whine "damned if we do and damned if we don't!"

So vindictive are they that they mercilessly pursue parents from country to country if they do manage to escape the "SS" clutches in the UK.

As for the family courts where even solicitors acting for the parents inevitably advise their clients not to fight the "SS" because they always win!

Social workers, guardians, hired "experts" and even the judges all "sing from the same hymn sheet" and if any parents reveal what happened to them in those courts they are ruthlessly jailed "to protect their own privacy" and for daring to the break the gag that prevents detailed protests.

What should be done?

1: - Let juries decide whether or not children should be removed permanently from parents.
2: - Scrap the gag that prevents both parents and children from revealing the unfairness and corruption now so prevalent in the family courts.



Mother in court over a birthday card
By Christopher Booker, Sunday Telegraph, telegraph.co.uk - May 10, 2010

Spanish authorities seize British boy from parents

Back to Articles

Back to Main